Much of the good
patient safety literature related to behavioral health comes from the VA health
system. Two new studies from the VA shed light on some of the adverse events
encountered on inpatient behavioral health units.
Mills and colleagues
searched the VA’s national database for any reported adverse event that
occurred on an inpatient mental health unit over a two year period and found 87
Root Cause Analysis (RCA) reports and 9780 safety reports (Mills
2018). The RCA’s included 31suicide attempts, 16 elopements, 10 assaults, 8
events involving hazardous items on the unit, 7 falls, 6 unexpected deaths, 3
overdoses and 6 cases coded as “other”. In safety reports falls were the most
common event, followed by medication events, verbal assaults, physical
assaults, medical problems and hazardous items on the unit. Mills and colleagues
recommend that mental health unit staff should undertake a structured assessment
of all risk on their units and that such a broad approach may be more
successful than focusing on a particular event type.
Another study from
the VA health system interviewed staff in 7 hospital-based mental health
settings for insights on causes of patient safety events and the factors that
constrain or facilitate patient safety efforts (True 2017).
Those researchers found that protective factors included: promoting a culture
of safety, advocating for patient-centeredness, and engaging administrators and
organizational leadership to champion these changes.
We’ve discussed suicide attempts, violent behaviors, and
elopements in multiple columns (listed below) and will not further discuss them
now. However, one point from the current Mills study worth noting is that, since
the VA focus on reducing all types of anchor points, available methods for
suicide attempts are less lethal, such as use of plastic bags used for
asphyxiation and use loose screws and poorly-maintained windows. This likely attests to the success of the from the VA’s Mental
Health Environment of Care Checklist, which we’ve discussed in so many
columns.
But we will reiterate the many medical issues we first
discussed in our May 10, 2016 Patient Safety Tip of the Week “Medical
Problems in Behavioral Health”. Behavioral
health units, whether they are standalone facilities or part of general
hospitals, are prone to many adverse events due to medical rather than
psychiatric conditions. There are a variety of factors predisposing to such
events and barriers to preventing them (see below).
Medical “Clearance”
What should be done
during “medical clearance” in the emergency room prior to admission to
behavioral health units has long been debated. Most now agree that the medical
history and physical should direct the need for laboratory or imaging studies
and that there really is no standard battery of tests that should be done. Most
testing is unnecessary and wasteful and delays admission to behavioral health.
Traditionally, the main goal of the “medical clearance” is to be sure that the
patient’s behavioral health presentation is not the result of an underlying
medical condition. But equally important should be identification of medical
problems that are likely to complicate management during a behavioral health
admission.
As above, “routine”
lab testing is seldom of value as part of the medical clearance. Even drug
toxicology screening is of limited benefit. Such drug screening is more likely
to identify recent use of drugs rather than identify drugs contributing to the
current behavioral health condition. However, we’d like to highlight one
problem that may be becoming more troubling. The ever-increasing use of long-acting
and/or delayed release formulations of opioids raises specific concerns.
We’ve seen patients who have taken such drugs and been alert in the ER with low
levels of drug in their urine screen yet become obtunded due to opioid
intoxication the following day due to the delayed absorption of these drugs.
Falls
Falls are
probably one of the more frequent adverse events on behavioral health units. In
our Patient Safety Tips of the Week for January
15, 2013 “Falls
on Inpatient Psychiatry” we noted that falls are disproportionately more
frequent on behavioral health units compared to med-surg
units. In that column and in our December 3, 2013 Patient Safety Tip of the
Week “Reducing
Harm from Falls on Inpatient Psychiatry” we noted also that injuries from
falls are also more likely with falls on psychiatric/behavioral health units.
One reason for more
falls is likely that patients are more active on behavioral health units. But
the other big reason is related to the medications used in behavioral health. Most
importantly, they are on a variety of medications that may increase the fall
risk (antipsychotics, antidepressants, sedative/hypnotics, and others). Some
may be confused or agitated. Others may have impaired gait or balance,
sometimes as a result of extrapyramidal side effects
of their medications. Many of the medications cause orthostatic hypotension.
The elderly patient on the behavioral health unit is especially at risk for
falls with injury. Another factor is that sometimes behavioral health units
restrict use of canes or other devices that could assist ambulation because such
might also be used as weapons.
Our March 14, 2017 Patient
Safety Tip of the Week “More
on Falls on Inpatient Psychiatry” was a comprehensive discussion on falls in the inpatient behavioral
health setting and we refer you to that column and the ones listed above for
details and recommendations. That column discussed risk factors for falls, such
as prior history of falls, activity levels, primary psychiatric diagnosis,
medications, sleep disturbances, and coexisting medical conditions. It also
emphasized that, just as on general medical units, falls are often related to
toileting activities. It also discussed environmental risk factors for falls,
and system issues such as time of day, miscommunication, equipment issues, and issues
with the culture of safety. We also noted that staff may not see psychiatric patients as medically ill and thus
may overlook their need for assistance in avoiding falls.
That column also discussed
fall risk assessment tools and how they apply to patients on behavioral health
units. But we can’t overemphasize the fact that, just like on med-surg units, fall risk is a dynamic risk and may change during the course of a behavioral health stay. For example,
extrapyramidal side effects may gradually evolve after certain drugs have been
started so patients should be examined daily to identify the occurrence of
extrapyramidal side effects and the fall prevention strategies modified
appropriately as they occur.
We refer you to the
3 columns listed above for details and recommendations on prevention of falls
and injuries from falls on behavioral health units.
Seizures
Seizures are not
uncommon on behavioral health units. Many of the drugs used may lower the
seizure threshold, particularly in patients with a previous history of
seizures. Withdrawal syndromes are a major concern, too (keeping in mind that
substance abuse a common comorbidity in behavioral health patients) and
seizures may be part of those syndromes. While seizures from alcohol withdrawal
typically occur early after abstinence, withdrawal from cessation of drugs like
benzodiazepines typically occur much later. And in patients with pre-existing
seizure disorders who have been on anticonvulsant therapy it is important to
recognize they may have been poorly adherent to their regimen. You should check
their serum anticonvulsant levels (if they are on anticonvulsants that have
therapeutic ranges) and make dosage adjustments as appropriate.
Most importantly, staff need to be trained in what to do
when a seizure does occur. That includes ensuring the patient does not injure
him/herself during the seizure and knowing how to get help in determining the
cause of the seizure and any subsequent management steps. They also need to
consider how other patients on the unit might react to seeing a seizure (and
especially prevent those patients from inadvertently injuring a patient in
attempt to help).
Cardiovascular Events
Cardiovascular events may also occur on behavioral health
units. We noted orthostatic hypotension as a cause for falls. Orthostatic hypotension may also cause syncopal
episodes. A whole host of drugs used in behavioral health, particularly certain
antidepressants and antipsychotic drugs, may cause orthostatic hypotension. We
won’t repeat our usual harangue about how to properly assess for orthostatic
hypotension but if you really want to know go back to our Patient Safety Tip of
the Week for January 15, 2013 “Falls
on Inpatient Psychiatry”.
Weight gain, metabolic syndrome, glucose intolerance and
frank diabetes mellitus may be seen as side effects of
several medications used in behavioral health, most notably the atypical
antipsychotics. Such may predispose to cardiovascular events.
Torsade de Pointes
is a form of ventricular tachycardia, often fatal, in which the QRS complexes
become “twisted” (changing in amplitude and morphology) and is best known for
its occurrence in patients with long QT
intervals. In our June 29, 2010 Patient Safety Tip of the Week “Torsade
de Pointes: Are Your Patients At Risk?” we discussed the risks of this
potentially fatal syndrome in hospitalized patients. Though cases of the long
QT interval syndrome (LQTS) may be congenital, many are acquired and due to a
variety of drugs that we prescribe. And many of those drugs may be used in
behavioral health settings. Perhaps the best known are haloperidol and methadone
but a variety of antipsychotic drugs and antidepressants may prolong the QT
interval (see our February 5, 2013 Patient Safety Tip of the Week “Antidepressants
and QT Interval Prolongation”). For a full list of drugs that commonly
cause prolongation of the QT interval and may lead to Torsade de Pointes, go to
the CredibleMeds™
website. So if one of these drugs will be
prescribed for a behavioral health patient they should have a baseline
electrocardiogram and then a followup one to see if
the QT interval has been prolonged to dangerous levels.
DVT
Deep venous
thrombosis (DVT) is relatively rare on behavioral health units. Yet every
year state incident reporting systems receive reports of DVT or even fatal
pulmonary embolism in patients on behavioral health units. This most often
occurs in patients with severe behavioral health problems that leave them
bedridden. We’ve seen DVT in one patient who had laid in bed at home several
weeks prior to admission. Therefore, it is essential that every patient
admitted to behavioral health units received an assessment for DVT risk factors
just as if they had been admitted to a med/surg unit.
Extrapyramidal
Syndromes
A major category of medications typically used on inpatient
psychiatric units are antipsychotic drugs that may have extrapyramidal side effects. These may affect gait, balance, and
reaction times to increase the risk of falls. When these drugs are started the
patient should be examined daily to identify the occurrence of extrapyramidal
side effects and the fall prevention strategies modified appropriately as they
occur.
Anticholinergic Side
Effects
Many of the drugs used in behavioral health have anticholinergic side effects. Dry mouth
is the most common symptom but dry eyes, mydriasis,
constipation, and others may occur. Probably the most significant
anticholinergic effect would be urinary
retention.
Other Medication Adverse
Events
The current Mills study did not go into detail about the
medication-related adverse events they found. But they did mention that one category
of event was overdose. One of the
root causes identified was a problem with hazardous items checks. The other
primary root cause was poor systems for managing opioid medication on the unit.
It is important to make sure that patients are taking their opioid medication
and not saving it to give to others or building up their own supply. In
addition, having naloxone immediately available to reverse the effects of an
opioid overdose is recommended. Along
those lines we’d like to reiterate a point made earlier about the ever-increasing
use of long-acting and/or delayed release formulations of opioids. We’ve
seen patients who have taken such drugs in suicide attempts. They had been alert in the ER with low levels of drug in their urine
screen so they are “cleared” for admission to a behavioral health unit. The
next day they become obtunded due to opioid intoxication resulting from the
delayed absorption of these drugs.
Eye Care and Oral
Health/Dental Hygiene
See our May 10, 2016 Patient Safety Tip of the Week “Medical
Problems in Behavioral Health” for issues related to eye care that are often overlooked on behavioral health inpatients.
Similarly, that column also discusses oral
health and dental hygiene that are often problematic in patients with behavioral
health issues.
Other Medical Conditions
Two medical conditions particularly prone to problems on inpatient behavioral health units are diabetes and pregnancy. Kan 2016)
(
Pregnancy and
behavioral health hospitalization raises both challenges and opportunities. An
older study (Miller
1990) found in a group of pregnant psychiatric patients admitted to a
psychiatric service a high rate of involuntary admission, homelessness, and
substance abuse, and identified many risk factors associated with noncompliance
with ongoing prenatal care. They concluded that brief psychiatric
hospitalization can be an important aspect in improving obstetric outcome by
providing an opportunity to collect obstetric information and promote ongoing
prenatal care.
Medical Emergencies
Medical emergencies like the neuroleptic malignant syndrome
and serotonin syndrome are rare but potentially life-threatening and need
prompt recognition and treatment. Neuroleptic
malignant syndrome (NMS) is characterized by fever, muscular rigidity,
altered mental status, and autonomic dysfunction. NMS usually occurs shortly
after the initiation of neuroleptic treatment (4-14 days) or after dose
increases. Serum CPK is often elevated and rhabdomyolysis and myoglobinuria may
be present. It may progress to renal failure, respiratory failure and death. In
addition to cessation of the offending neuroleptic agent, treatment is mostly
supportive. Several drugs have been tried as treatments but evidence for their
effectiveness is limited (Tse
2015).
The serotonin
syndrome is another potentially life-threatening condition with some
similarities to the neuroleptic malignant syndrome. It also may have signs of
autonomic instability (tachycardia, hypertension, dilated pupils, diaphoresis,
piloerection), fever, and muscle rigidity. Other muscular phenomena are
twitching, myoclonus, clonus, hyperreflexia, shivering, and loss of
coordination. Seizures, unconsciousness and arrhythmia occur in severe cases.
It is associated with serotoninergic medications, such as selective serotonin
reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), and usually evolves more rapidly than NMS.
Diagnosis is clinical and lab tests are not diagnostic. Treatment consists of
cessation of the offending agent(s) and supportive care. Benzodiazepines are
often used for sedation. Symptoms and signs usually disappear within a day of
cessation of the offending agent(s) though they may last longer if the
half-life of the offending agent is longer. Those cases associated with
monoamine oxidase inhibitors tend to be more severe. Drugs that have serotonin
antagonism (eg. cyproheptadine) have been used in
some cases but evidence of efficacy is limited.
In the current Mills study, unexpected death (unrelated to suicide) on a VA mental health unit was
relatively rare, with only 5 such deaths in their system over the 2-year period
of study. They found that the primary root cause for sudden death on a mental
health unit was a delay in recognizing
and treating a serious medical condition that ultimately proved to be
fatal.
Barriers/Challenges/Models
of Care
As opposed to training for staff in prevention of suicide,
assaults, and elopements, training for staff in recognizing and preventing
medical adverse events is typically less vigorous or totally lacking on
behavioral health units.
Moreover, as mentioned above, we noted that staff may not see psychiatric patients as
medically ill and therefore are less attuned to prevention of and
recognition of factors predisposing to “medical” adverse events.
Barriers to care of comorbid medical conditions are common on behavioral health units
Our May 10, 2016 Patient Safety Tip of the Week “Medical
Problems in Behavioral Health” discussed several potential models of care for handling medical
problems on behavioral health units:
We refer you to that article for details of each model.
We also need to be cognizant that the hospital may be only source of attention to medical care that
many of these patients will be exposed to. We know how difficult it often is
just arranging for post-discharge behavioral health care in these patients. It
is equally difficult ensuring they get
adequate followup for their medical problems.
Some of our past columns on issues related to behavioral
health:
References:
Mills PD, Watts BV, Shiner B, Hemphill RR. Adverse events
occurring on mental health units. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2018; 50: 63-68
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163834317303286
True G, Frasso R, Cullen SW, et
al. Adverse events in veterans affairs inpatient
psychiatric units: Staff perspectives on contributing and protective factors.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2017; 48: 65-71
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163834317302220
Mental Health Environment of Care Checklist (VA)
http://www.patientsafety.va.gov/docs/MHEOCCed092016508.xlsx
http://www.patientsafety.va.gov/professionals/onthejob/mentalhealth.asp
CredibleMeds™ website.
Kan C, Kaar
SJ, M. Eisa M, et al. Diabetes management in
psychiatric inpatients: time to change? Diabetes Medicine 2016; 33(3): 407-408;
Article first published online: 11 FEB 2016
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dme.12838/abstract
Miller WH, Resnick MP, Williams MH, Bloom JD. The pregnant
psychiatric inpatient: a missed opportunity. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 1990 ; 12(6): 373-378
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/016383439090004V
Tse L, Barr AM, Scarapicchia V, Vila-Rodriguez F. Neuroleptic Malignant
Syndrome: A Review from a Clinically Oriented Perspective. Curr Neuropharmacol 2015; 13 (3): 395-406
http://benthamscience.com/journals/current-neuropharmacology/volume/13/issue/3/page/395/
Print “PDF
version”
http://www.patientsafetysolutions.com/