Print PDF version
A recent study (Ivanovic 2023)
showed statistically significant
associations of diagnostic error for neuroimaging examinations with longer interpretation times, higher shift
volumes, and weekend interpretation.
These three variables were found to be risk factors for diagnostic error at
both the individual neuroradiologist and neuroradiology division levels,
respectively. There was no association with emergency or inpatient settings or
with trainee participation in interpretation.
Interesting
findings, but further drill down would have been helpful. We strongly suspect
that two factors probably underly these associations fatigue and
interruptions. Weve done several columns on the impact of these:
Ivanovic et al. note that the association between higher shift volumes and diagnostic error is
consistent with the results of prior studies and numerous studies have found an
association between error rates and longer radiology workdays, with a peak in
errors after the 10th hour of work. They acknowledge that radiologist fatigue
may account for these associations of error with shift volume or duration. Some
prior studies have shown that radiology errors may be associated with shorter
interpretation times but they suspect the association
with longer interpretation times in their study may reflect more complex cases
or that interruptions might have played a role.
Some of our prior columns on patient safety issues in the radiology suite:
· October 2020 New Warnings on Implants and MRI
· January 2021 New MRI Risk: Face Masks
· May 25, 2021 Yes, Radiologists Have Handoffs, Too
References:
Ivanovic V. Broadhead K, Beck R, et al. Factors Associated With Neuroradiology Diagnostic Errors at a Large Tertiary-Care Academic Medical Center: A Case-Control Study. American Journal of Roentgenology 2023; March 29, 2023
https://www.ajronline.org/doi/abs/10.2214/AJR.22.28925
Print PDF version
http://www.patientsafetysolutions.com/
Whats New in
the Patient Safety World Archive