View as PDF version
Patient Safety Tip of the Week
May 23, 2023
Smudges as
Patient Safety Threats
When we were doing our very first electronic medical record implementation, we wanted to see how the just implemented barcoding system at that hospital was doing. Our very first observation of a nurse administering medications via the barcoding system was eye opening. The label on the medication was smudged so the nurse simply copied and pasted the medication label from the CPOE system, totally bypassing the safety built into the barcoding system.
ISMP recently published a warning about a danger related to a smudged IV bag label (ISMP 2023). A critically ill, septic elderly patient was receiving high doses of three vasopressors, including norepinephrine, to maintain adequate blood pressure, as well as a heparin infusion for new-onset atrial fibrillation with a rapid ventricular response. An alert from the smart infusion pump said the norepinephrine infusion was running low. A nurse ordered and received from the pharmacy both a norepinephrine infusion and also a heparin infusion since the latter was also running low. The nurse mistakenly hung the heparin infusion bag instead of the norepinephrine bag on the IV pole directly behind the currently running norepinephrine bag in anticipation of needing to change the bag. The nurse then attempted to scan the barcode label affixed to the bag of heparin, thinking it was norepinephrine. But the barcode would not scan because it had been smudged with alcohol-based hand sanitizer. As a workaround, the nurse scanned the bag of norepinephrine currently infusing. The nurse did not further examine the heparin label and administered it at the rate the norepinephrine infusion had been running. Shortly thereafter the patient had a cardiac arrest. The patient was resuscitated and the erroneous heparin administration was discovered. However, the patient continued to deteriorate and died 2 days later.
Investigation of the incident identified several contributing factors, including recognition that the heparin infusion with the smudged label and barcode should not have been used. Rather, it should have been returned to the pharmacy. Use of a proxy scan of the barcode on the previously administered norepinephrine infusion bag was a key error. Similar errors with proxy barcode scanning have been reported.
ISMP recommended several recommendations to prevent this type of error:
· Pharmacy should purchase premixed heparin and norepinephrine infusions, when possible, and require barcode scanning of the manufacturers barcode before dispensing and administering the product
· Medication labels should be tested to see whether smudging of the label and barcode information is possible, especially since practitioners frequently use alcohol-based sanitizers when handling medications
· Never use a medication with a smudged label or barcode
· Educate practitioners during orientation and annually thereafter, not to administer a medication with a label that is smudged and unreadable, or if the barcode is smudged, which would render it unscannable
· Develop an escalation process for what to do if a medication barcode will not scan (e.g., contact the pharmacy for immediate help)
· If a barcode will not scan, never use a proxy scan, such as scanning the barcode on an empty infusion or alternative label that is not on the medication being administered
Barcoding is arguably our most powerful medication safety tool. But workarounds continue to negate the safety mechanisms that make barcoding so important. In many of our previous columns (see, for example, our September 28, 2021 Patient Safety Tip of the Week Barcoding Better? Not So Fast!) weve noted the seminal study by Ross Koppel and colleagues (Koppel 2008) that identified 15 types of workarounds and 31 types of causes for the workarounds in barcoding medication administration systems. Workarounds, such as use of the proxy scan, are dangerous and can have devastating consequences such as the outcome in the case described above.
Smudges are dangerous. Weve also noted that faxes can have a role in
promoting 10-fold medication errors. A smudge on the fax can obscure a decimal
point, resulting in a 10-fold overdose. Alternatively, a smudge on faxed orders
could look like a decimal point, so the patient receives one-tenth the intended
dose (see our June 19, 2012 Patient Safety Tip of the Week More
Problems with Faxed Orders). While most healthcare facilities no longer
accept faxed orders, a clinician might be referring to faxed medical records as
he/she enters orders via CPOE or an ePrescribing
system. See our May 2021 What's New in the Patient Safety World column Axe
the Fax for more comments on why we need to get rid of the fax in
healthcare.
See some of our other
Patient Safety Tip of the Week columns dealing with barcoding:
·
June 17, 2008 Technology Workarounds
Defeat Safety Intent
· April 5, 2016 Workarounds Overriding
Safety
· February 28, 2017 The Copy and Paste ETTO
· January 2018 Can We Improve Barcoding?
· September 2020 More on Workarounds
· September 28, 2021 Barcoding Better? Not So
Fast!
· June 2022 Where Are You Barcoding?
See some of our other
Patient Safety Tip of the Week columns dealing with unintended consequences of
technology and other healthcare IT issues:
·
June 19, 2007 Unintended Consequences of
Technological Solutions
·
May 20, 2008 CPOE Unintended Consequences
Are Wrong Patient Errors More Common?
·
June 17, 2008 Technology Workarounds
Defeat Safety Intent
·
August 26, 2008 Pattern Recognition and CPOE
·
September 9, 2008 Less is More
.and Do You
Really Need that Decimal?
·
December 16, 2008 Joint Commission Sentinel
Event Alert on Hazards of Healthcare IT
·
February 2009 Healthcare IT The Good and
The Bad
· March 3, 2009 Overriding
Alerts
Like Surfin the Web
·
October 2009 A Cautious View on CPOE
·
November 24, 2009 Another Rough Month for
Healthcare IT
·
April
20, 2010 HITs
Limited Impact on Quality To Date
· July 27, 2010 EMRs Still Have a Long Way
to Go
·
March 22, 2011 An
EMR Feature Detrimental to Teamwork and Patient Safety
·
January 24, 2012 Patient Safety in Ambulatory
Care
·
June 26, 2012 Using
Patient Photos to Reduce CPOE Errors
· June 2012 Leapfrog
CPOE Simulation: Improvement But Still Shortfalls
· July 17, 2012 More
on Wrong-Patient CPOE
· January 2013 More
IT Unintended Consequences
· April 23, 2013 Plethora of Medication
Safety Studies
· April
30, 2013 Photographic Identification
to Prevent Errors
· October 8, 2013 EMR
Problems in the ED
· March 11, 2014 We
Miss the Graphic Flowchart!
· October 2014 Ebola
Exposes Fundamental Flaw
· January 2015 Beneficial
Effect of EMR on Patient Safety
· March 2015 CPOE
Fails to Catch Prescribing Errors
· March 31, 2015 Clinical
Decision Support for Pneumonia
· August 2015 Newborn
Name Confusion
·
December
2015 Opioid Alert Fatigue
· January 12, 2016 New
Resources on Improving Safety of Healthcare IT
· January 19, 2016 Patient Identification in
the Spotlight
· February 9, 2016 It was just a matter of
time
· April 5, 2016 Workarounds Overriding
Safety
·
May 2016 Name Confusion in the
Pharmacy
· May 3, 2016 Clinical Decision Support
Malfunction
· May 24, 2016 Texting Orders Is It
Really Safe?
· August 23, 2016 ISMP Canada: Automation Bias
and Automation Complacency
· November 22, 2016 Leapfrog, Picklists, and
Healthcare IT Vulnerabilities
· January 2017 Joint Commission Thinks
Twice About Texting Orders
· February 28, 2017 The Copy and Paste ETTO
· March 2017 Yes! Another Voice for
Medication e-Discontinuation!
· April 2017 How Much Time Do We Actually
Spend on the EMR?
· June 27, 2017 Texting We Told You So!
· August 1, 2017 Progress on Wrong Patient
Orders
· January 2018 Can We Improve Barcoding?
· January 16, 2018 Just the Fax, Maam
· January 30, 2018 Texting Errors Revealed
· June 19, 2018 More EHR-Related Problems
· September 2018 More Clinical Decision
Support Successes
· December 11, 2018 Another NMBA Accident
· January 1, 2019 More on Automated Dispensing
Cabinet (ADC) Safety
· February 5, 2019 Flaws in Our Medication
Safety Technologies
· March 26, 2019 Patient Misidentification
· May 2019 Too Much Time on the EMR
· May 21, 2019 Mixed Message on Number of
Open EMR Records
· July 23, 2019 Order Sets Can Nudge the
Right Way or the Wrong Way
· September 10, 2019 Joint Commission Naming
Standard Leaves a Gap
· September 24, 2019 EHR-related Malpractice
Claims
· December 17, 2019 Tale of Two Tylers
·
June 2020
EMR
and Medication Safety: Better But Not Yet There
· June 16, 2020 Tracking Technologies
· July 2020 Patient Requests for EHR
Corrections
· July 21, 2020 Is This Patient Allergic to
Penicillin?
· September 2020 More on Workarounds
· November 17, 2020 A Picture Is Worth a
Thousand Words
· March 2021 ECRI Partnership Whitepaper
on Alert Fatigue
· May 11, 2021 How Are Alerts in Ambulatory
CPOE Doing?
· July 2021 EPIC Sepsis Prediction Tool
Falls Short
· September 28, 2021 Barcoding Better? Not So
Fast!
· October 2021 Tool to Prevent Discontinued
Medications from Being Dispensed
· October 2021 More on Smartphones and
Watches Effect on Cardiac Devices
· November 2021 Panic Buttons to Protect
Healthcare Workers But a Word of Caution
· December 2021 Can AI Triage Postoperative
Patients More Appropriately?
· May 2022 Reduced Mortality Using
Pneumonia Clinical Decision Support Tool
· June 2022 Where Are You Barcoding?
· August 2022 CDSS Success for Pediatric
Head CT
· September 13, 2022 Smart Socks and Robots for
Fall Prevention?
· November 22, 2022 The Apple Watch and Patient
Safety
References:
ISMP (Institute for Safe Medication Practices). Smudged IV bag label and a proxy scan set up a patient for a cardiac arrest. ISMP Nurse AdviseERR Medication Safety Alert! 2023; 21(5): May 2023
https://www.ismp.org/nursing/medication-safety-alert-may-2023
Koppel R, Tosha Wetterneck T, Telles JL, Karsh B-T. Workarounds to Barcode Medication Administration Systems: Their Occurrences, Causes, and Threats to Patient Safety. JAMIA 2008; 15(4): 408-423
https://academic.oup.com/jamia/article/15/4/408/731255
Print PDF version

http://www.patientsafetysolutions.com/