View as “PDF version”
Patient Safety Tip of the Week
October 24, 2023
Serious MRI
Accident at Unregulated MRI Center
A serious MRI accident went largely under the radar for over
a year because of lack of regulatory oversight of an imaging unit. A prisoner
in Arizona was to have an MRI scan (Kovaleski
2023a, Kovaleski
2023b). The prisoner’s guard removed metal shackles from the prisoner’s
legs but asked what to do about the metal shackles around her waist. The
MRI technician told him not to remove those. As the prisoner walked near the machine,
about 3-4 feet away, she was lifted off her feet into the bore of the MRI. She immediately
felt “excruciating pain from the belly shackles, which were pulling her harder
and harder, and described feeling like she was being ripped in half”.
To make things worse, the tech then asked the prison guard to
go in and help and he was also “stuck to the MRI machine because of his gun.”
Several minutes apparently went by before anyone hit the
emergency shutoff button, despite pleas from the prisoner and the guard. Apparently,
employees were waiting for the lead engineer who had advised them to wait until
he got on scene.
The prisoner was taken to the emergency room and the prison
took photos of her injuries, which showed a deep cut on her hand that required
stitches, bruises, and imprints from where the metal shackles pulled on her
body.
The Arizona Department of Health Services regulates and
licenses imaging centers but, ironically, this MRI facility had no license found
on the health department’s website. Though the company that operates this
facility operates more than 60 imaging centers across the state, this company was
not regulated by ADHS because of an exemption the state granted the company. Apparently,
it had a private provider exemption because it was physician-owned (private
providers are only exempt from licensing in Arizona if they are owned by a
doctor or doctors who are treating patients at the clinic).
So, the state did not know of the incident for some time. Moreover,
the FDA was not notified because the injury did not meet the threshold for reporting.
The FDA only requires reporting for what it calls “a serious adverse event” if
there was an “admission to the hospital.” This patient was only taken to the ER
and never admitted to the hospital. Apparently, the company did voluntarily
report this incident to the FDA, but the report was filed more than 10 months
after the incident happened. Note also that report
which was filed with FDA’s MAUDE Adverse Event Report system says “officer that
was with the patient/inmate was not cleared but entered the room to help and
was pulled to the MRI machine and stuck to the MRI machine as well. The MRI
machine had to be turned off (quenched) to relieve both the patient and the
officer from the MRI machine.” The company did not provide the media reporters a reason for the delay in reporting the accident.
The Arizona Department of Health Services is reviewing how
it licenses and regulates all imaging centers.
But there is another very important lesson here – we always
recommend you do at least an annual inservice on MRI
safety with your local police and fire departments (plus include upfront
training for new recruits to those agencies). See our October 21, 2014 Patient Safety Tip of the Week “The
Fire Department and Your Hospital”. And obviously, if you do business with prison systems you need
to include them in those inservices. Perhaps if the
MRI center in this incident had done such inservices,
the guard might have challenged the MRI tech regarding the shackles and would
have known enough to never enter the MRI unit with his gun.
This case is a stark reminder that failure to follow strict
MRI protocols has the potential to cause serious injury or death. Two people
stuck in the bore of an MRI could lead to asphyxiation of one or both
individuals. And what might have happened if the gun discharged!
Some of our prior columns
on patient safety issues related to MRI:
·
February 19, 2008 “MRI Safety”
·
March 17, 2009 “More on MRI Safety”
·
October 2008 “Preventing Infection in MRI”
·
March 2009 “Risk of Burns during MRI
Scans from Transdermal Drug Patches”
·
January
25, 2011 “Procedural
Sedation in Children”
·
February
1, 2011 “MRI
Safety Audit”
·
October
25, 2011 “Renewed
Focus on MRI Safety”
·
August
2012 “Newest
MRI Hazard: Ingested Magnets”
·
October
22, 2013 “How
Safe Is Your Radiology Suite?”
·
October
21, 2014 “The
Fire Department and Your Hospital”
·
August
25, 2015 “Checklist
for Intrahospital Transport”
·
August
2016 “Guideline Update for
Pediatric Sedation”
·
October
2016 “MRI Safety: There’s an App
for That!”
·
January
17, 2017 “Pediatric MRI Safety”
·
August
8, 2017 “Sedation for Pediatric MRI
Rising”
·
March
2018 “MRI Death a Reminder of
Dangers”
·
March
2018 “Cardiac Devices Safe During
MRI But Spinners!?”
·
November
2018 “OMG! Not My iPhone!”
·
April 2,
2019 “Unexpected Events During MRI”
·
September
2019 “New MRI Hazard: Magnetic
Eyelashes”
·
October
15, 2019 “Lots More on MRI Safety”
·
November
5, 2019 “A Near-Fatal MRI Incident”
·
November
2019 “ECRI Institute’s Top 10
Health Technology Hazards for 2020”
·
January
7, 2020 “Even More Concerns About MRI
Safety”
·
March
2020 “Airway Emergencies in the
MRI Suite”
·
October
2020 “New Warnings on Implants and
MRI”
·
January
2021 “New MRI Risk: Face Masks”
·
June 1,
2021 “Stronger Magnets, More MRI
Safety Concerns”
·
November
2021 “Yet Another Risk During MRI”
·
January
2022 “MRI Safety Issues”
·
July 26,
2022 “More Risks in the Radiology
Suite”
References:
Kovaleski J. Records: AZ inmate, prison guard stuck to MRI
machine at unregulated imaging center. ABC15 Arizona 2023; October 10, 2023
Kovaleski J. SimonMed didn’t have
to tell federal regulators about inmate, guard stuck to MRI machine. ABC15 Arizona
2023; October 11, 2023
Print “PDF version”

http://www.patientsafetysolutions.com/