Print PDF version
Weve done many columns on PIMs (Potentially Inappropriate
Medications) in the elderly and many on deprescribing. But does deprescribing actually translate into fewer adverse drug events (ADEs)?
The MedSafer Study was a study on electronic decision
support for deprescribing in hospitalized older adults intended to answer this
question.
MedSafer was a cluster randomized clinical trial of older (≥65
years) hospitalized patients with an expected survival of more than 3 months
who were admitted to 1 of 11 acute care hospitals in Canada (McDonald 2022). Participants were taking 5 or more
medications per day at the time of admission. Reports of deprescribing
opportunities generated by MedSafer software were based
on patients usual home medications and measures of prognosis and frailty.
Almost 6000 patients were enrolled. Deprescribing
increased from 29.8% in control patients to 55.4% in intervention participants.
There was no difference in adverse drug withdrawal events between groups. However,
there was no significant difference in the primary outcome, ADEs within 30
days of discharge (5.0% in controls vs 4.9% in intervention participants). The
incidence of postdischarge falls did decrease but not statistically
significantly (odds ratio, 0.76). Sleep and quality of life remained stable
before and after hospitalization.
One problem was that, despite cluster randomization, groups were
not balanced (participants in the intervention arm were older and had more PIMS
prescribed at baseline). But sensitivity analyses, including addressing those
imbalances, did not alter study conclusions.
The researchers had used a historical rate of ADEs in the
first 30 days following deprescribing to establish the power of the study. That
rate, taken mostly from studies done more than 15 years ago, was 10 to 15%. But
the rate of these ADEs in both arms of the current study was much lower (5%
and 4.9%). The authors also note that widespread hospital pharmacist
involvement in medication reconciliation has created opportunities to mitigate more
worrisome prescribing practices, such as errors of omission, which may lead to
clearly identifiable ADEs.
The authors also note that, while the intervention
identified numerous deprescribing opportunities, many were for low-risk
nonbeneficial polypharmacy (eg, nonstatin
cholesterol-lowering medications or stool softeners) and deprescribing these medications
is less likely to impact 30-day ADEs. But that still has both patient and
societal value (avoiding excess cost, waste, pill burden, etc.).
The authors had many suggestions for future studies on the
impact of deprescribing on ADEs (eg. more prolonged
duration, focus on more high-risk PIMs, etc.).
In sum, the study found that providing deprescribing decision
support to the acute care medical teams did not impact 30-day ADE rates. But it
did effectively stop many PIMs, and did so safely, with
no evidence of increased harm. So, is the glass half empty, or half full?
Some of our past columns on deprescribing:
Some of our past columns on Beers List and Inappropriate Prescribing in the Elderly:
References:
McDonald EG, Wu PE, Rashidi B, et al. The MedSafer StudyElectronic Decision Support for
Deprescribing in Hospitalized Older Adults: A Cluster Randomized Clinical
Trial. JAMA Intern Med 2022; Published online January 18, 2022
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2788297
Print PDF version
http://www.patientsafetysolutions.com/
Whats New in
the Patient Safety World Archive