View as “PDF version

Patient Safety Tip of the Week

October 25, 2022

Which Room Do You Want?

 

 

If you are hospitalized, you’d like to think that it doesn’t matter what room you are put into. But, in reality, your risks may depend upon a number of features of that room.

 

Researchers from the University of Michigan (Mead 2022) studied almost 4000 patients who underwent 13 high-risk surgical procedures at the University of Michigan Hospital. They looked at clinical outcomes as related to certain features of patient rooms - window or no window, single occupancy, double occupancy, distance to the nursing station, and line of sight to clinicians.

 

Key findings of that study:

·       Mortality rates for high-risk procedures varied across room design features and room type.

·       Room features that influenced clinical outcomes after surgery included distance from a nursing station, single room occupancy, and having a direct line of sight where clinicians can see into the room.

·       After adjusting for patient comorbidities and complexity of the operation, mortality rates were 20% higher (odds ratio 1.2) if patients were admitted to a hospital room without a window than if they were put in a room with a window.

·       For patients staying in a room without a window, 30-day mortality rates were 10% higher (odds ratio 1.1).

·       Though mortality rates varied across room design, mortality rates did not vary by room type after accounting for length of stay, suggesting that length of stay does not account for differences in mortality. 

 

A 2010 study looking at ICU design (Leaf 2010) compared patient mortality between rooms that were not visible from the MICU central nursing station (low-visible rooms or LVR’s) to high-visible rooms (HVR’s). The researchers found that severely ill patients (those with Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores > 30) had significantly higher hospital mortality when admitted to an LVR than did similarly ill patients admitted to an HVR. ICU mortality showed a similar pattern.

 

Most hospitals have probably already been putting some of their sicker patients in rooms with these features. The University of Michigan study found that sicker patients were more likely to get single rooms, closer to a nursing station and within direct line of sight, and a window view.

 

The UM researchers are looking to replicate their study across other hospital systems.

 

We do have one caveat: one unintended consequence is that there is a risk of alarm fatigue if the rooms are too close to nursing station. We’ve seen instances where alarm volumes have been lowered in those rooms because the noise in the nurses’ or physicians’ work areas has been distracting.

 

Of course, there have been other studies looking at the impact of room design on patient outcomes, particularly as related to hospital-acquired infections (HAI’s). McDonald et al. (McDonald 2019) looked at HAI rates after inpatients in an older, tertiary care, 417-bed hospital in Montréal, Canada, that consisted of mainly mixed 3- and 4-person ward-type rooms were moved to a new 350-bed facility with all private rooms. The new hospital had 100% single-patient rooms equipped with individual toilets and showers and easy access to sinks for hand washing. The move appeared to be associated with a sustained decrease in the rates of new MRSA and VRE colonization and VRE infection. However, the move was not associated with a reduction in CDI or MRSA infection. Another study (O’Neill 2018) found that patients who stay in private rooms as opposed to double occupancy rooms have a reduced risk of central line infections.

 

And our many columns on delirium have pointed out the importance of having a window to the outside to promote normal day/night cycles as one factor combating the risk of delirium.

 

We still have a lot to learn about the impact of patient rooms on clinical outcomes. The Michigan study has implications for future hospital design, but it also has important implications for hospital bed triage.

 

 

References:

 

 

Mead MJ, et al. Evaluating Mortality and Hospital Room Design after High-Risk Inpatient Surgery. Scientific Forum. American College of Surgeons Clinical Congress 2022. As reported by the ACS October 16, 2022

https://www.facs.org/for-medical-professionals/conferences-and-meetings/clinical-congress-2022/media/ccnewskit/hospital-room-features-may-impact-clinical-outcomes-for-patients-after-surgery/

 

 

Leaf DE, Homel P, Factor PH. Relationship between ICU design and mortality. Chest 2010; 137(5): 1022-1027

https://journal.chestnet.org/article/S0012-3692(10)60225-5/fulltext

 

 

McDonald EG, Dendukuri N, Frenette C, et al. Time-Series Analysis of Health Care–Associated Infections in a New Hospital with All Private Rooms. JAMA Intern Med 2019; Published online August 19, 2019

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2747870

 

 

O’Neill L, Park S-H, Rosinia F. The role of the built environment and private rooms for reducing central line-associated bloodstream infections. PLOS One 2018; Published: July 27, 2018

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0201002

 

 

 

 

 

 

Print “PDF version

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

http://www.patientsafetysolutions.com/

 

Home

 

Tip of the Week Archive

 

What’s New in the Patient Safety World Archive